The brand new questionnaire contains step 3 bits. Region I included questions out-of socio-group investigation (many years, amount of studies, parity, familial money, occupation, current marital position, sexual interest https://getbride.org/da/cubanske-kvinder/, reputation for HPV vaccination, and reputation of irregular cervical malignant tumors evaluating).

Region II composed of six questions about the mark women who can be processed, age to start, regularity, age otherwise requirements to cease away from evaluation, and methods from tests. Only the professionals who had heard regarding HPV do go ahead in order to Region III and this analyzed knowledge about HPV off their method of (oncogenic otherwise non-oncogenic), form regarding signal and you may prevention.

Ahead of the analysis, the fresh questionnaire off region II and you may area III in the Thai version was indeed contemplated, discussed, and revised up until consensus certainly one of 20 scientists who had been most of the gynecologic oncologists (specific was basically people in other parallel training). The pros rated every one of 19 inquiries as the often ‘relevant’ or ‘perhaps not relevant’. The item-peak Content Authenticity Directory (I-CVI) is determined for each and every product, and also the Content Validity Index (CVI) try computed if you take the typical ratio regarding 14 questions about information about cervical cancer tumors examination and you will 5 questions relating to HPV. The CVI have been 1 for both components of the newest questionnaire (S1 Table). The reliability was checked-out within the 31 feminine with the same trait while the participants. The fresh Cronbach’ alpha coefficients to your precision was in fact 0.819 to own knowledge about cervical cancer evaluation and you will 0.907 to own understanding of HPV.

Investigation collection

To the date out-of planned colposcopy, the analysis secretary provided information of your analysis to the feminine just who found introduction conditions. The ladies just who wanted to participate gave composed informed agree and you can answered brand new questionnaire on their own on their own before continuing in order to colposcopy.

Studies collected for this analysis was basically socio-group research (Part We of your survey), experience with cervical malignant tumors testing (Region II), and you can experience in HPV (Part III).

Statistical analysis

New answers of knowledge on cervical cancer tumors screening and you can HPV were analyzed by the for each and every item just before rating categorization. Best address is actually scored while the 1 while ‘wrong and you can being unsure of answer’ was obtained 0.

Off fourteen inquiries out-of cervical cancers examination, female whoever get have been ? 10 was indeed arbitrarily classified as having ‘a great knowledge’ usually was in fact regarded as with “unhealthy training”. To possess knowledge of HPV, women whose respond to is ‘never ever observed HPV’ was in fact omitted about studies away from HPV knowledge.

From 5 issues, female whose get was in fact ? step 3 was indeed considered as with ‘a beneficial experience in HPV’ if not as the ‘negative knowledge’. Out-of 19 concerns, female whoever rating was ? 13 have been categorized just like the having ‘an excellent full knowledge’ otherwise because the ‘unhealthy overall knowledge’.

The investigation was indeed built-up for the a digital database and assessed having fun with SPSS V.26.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Descriptive analytics were used to analyze market data and you will was in fact described once the number that have fee, suggest that have practical departure otherwise average that have range. The fresh new connection between for each varying and you will education score had been examined using simple linear regression. Exploratory model was developed for the multivariable analysis also all the parameters probably about the details rating. The brand new noticed number of statistical importance is a p-value of 0.05 otherwise reduced.

Results

Out of 500 women who met inclusion criteria and were invited to the study, one ong 499 women who responded to the questionnaire about knowledge of cervical cancer and screening (part II) and knowledge about HPV (part II), two did not provide personal information. So demographic data were available in only 497 women (Table 1). The mean age of 497 participants was years (SD ± ). More than half of the participants were aged < 40>